Difference between revisions of "Titanology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Trismegistus (talk | contribs) (created) |
Trismegistus (talk | contribs) m (correction) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Titanology is the scholarly study of the myths of ancient [[titans]] and cyclopean sites associated with them. Titanology is divided as an academic discipline between the traditionalists and the [[titanist]]s. Traditionalists emphasize the body of original literature about titans as the substance of an ancient Geddamin civilization of some notoriety. Titanists see the ancient accounts as originally truthful with errors and lacuna introduced through the long period of decline between the [[Antediluvian]] past and modern times. Despite this philosophical difference, most of the sources for these two branches remain the same, including the [[ | + | Titanology is the scholarly study of the myths of ancient [[titans]] and cyclopean sites associated with them. Titanology is divided as an academic discipline between the traditionalists and the [[titanist]]s. Traditionalists emphasize the body of original literature about titans as the substance of an ancient Geddamin civilization of some notoriety. Titanists see the ancient accounts as originally truthful with errors and lacuna introduced through the long period of decline between the [[Antediluvian]] past and modern times. Despite this philosophical difference, most of the sources for these two branches remain the same, including the [[Aturyandakumi]]. |
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 21 March 2014
Titanology is the scholarly study of the myths of ancient titans and cyclopean sites associated with them. Titanology is divided as an academic discipline between the traditionalists and the titanists. Traditionalists emphasize the body of original literature about titans as the substance of an ancient Geddamin civilization of some notoriety. Titanists see the ancient accounts as originally truthful with errors and lacuna introduced through the long period of decline between the Antediluvian past and modern times. Despite this philosophical difference, most of the sources for these two branches remain the same, including the Aturyandakumi.
See Also
| This article is a stub. It requires further development by the creator. |